Ryan Nijboer vs Gonzalo Bueno Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 04 Aug at 09:41 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
R. Nijboer vs G. Bueno

NED
0
Win
Played
1
Win

PER
0
Win
Played
1
Win
Head-to-head: Nijboer 0 - 1 Bueno
They have played 3 sets in total, with Ryan Nijboer winning 1 and Gonzalo Bueno winning 2. The last match between Gonzalo Bueno and Ryan Nijboer was at the Cordenons Challenger, 05-08-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Draw getting the victory 7-6(4) 4-6 7-5.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Nijboer | 0 |
| Bueno | 1 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) Cordenons Challenger(08-05-25)
R. Nijboer vs G. Bueno H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $5,735 | Career Prize Money | $3,200 |
| 56.63% (299-229) | Career Total W/L | 55.43% (143-115) |
| 0 | Clay | 1 |
| 3 | Titles | 6 |
| 0 | Total H2H Matches | 1 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 100.00% (2-0) |
R. Nijboer vs G. Bueno Match Preview:
- Second serve success: Bueno has a slight edge with 41.29% of points won on second serve compared to Nijboer's 40.37%. But does it significantly predict the winner? Yes, historically it has a high predictive accuracy.
- First serve return: Bueno outperforms Nijboer by winning 32.05% of first serve return points versus Nijboer's 28.71%. Can Bueno leverage this advantage? It's likely to contribute to favoring Bueno in the match.
- Under pressure: Bueno again holds a slight advantage by saving 50% of breakpoints compared to Nijboer's 47.77%. Will this help Bueno when under pressure? It could be crucial for in-game scenarios.
- Match win rates: Nijboer has a higher win rate of 57.61% over the past year compared to Bueno's 53.62%. Does Nijboer have better overall form? This stat suggests so, potentially indicating Nijboer as a strong contender.
- Surface strength: While Bueno excels on Clay (56%), Nijboer favors Hard courts (59%). Which player might perform better on surfaces they prefer? It depends on the match surface.
- Event level performance: Bueno competes mainly in Challengers/ITF level while Nijboer in Futures/Satellites, winning 52.54% and 66.67% respectively. Does the tournament level matter? Context is key when evaluating their chances.
- Opponent ranking: Bueno faces tougher competitors with an average opponent rank of 272.16, whereas Nijboer's average opponent rank is 466.91. Can Bueno's experience against better-ranked players be an advantage? Possibly.
- Deciding set ability: Bueno is impressive, winning 64% of deciding sets against Nijboer's 39%. How critical is this in tightly contested matches? It's a strong indicator of Bueno's mental strength in clutch moments.
- Breakpoint conversion: The players are evenly matched in breakpoint conversion, with Bueno at 36.67% and Nijboer at 36.61%. Is this a factor in predicting match outcomes? It often influences live betting tips.
Editorial Prediction (August 4, 2025, UTC):
As we analyze their performances, each player brings specific strengths to this matchup. Bueno's marginally better second serve performance and ability to win under pressure may play a crucial role, especially in high-stakes moments.
Meanwhile, Nijboer's overall winning percentage suggests better recent form, but the level of competition he has faced is typically lower. This detail might influence his ability to sustain his match-winning momentum against a player of Bueno's caliber.
Their skills on preferred surfaces could also subtly impact their performance, although it ultimately depends on the playing surface. If the match becomes tightly contested, Bueno's superior record in deciding sets is likely to be decisive.
After considering these factors, Bueno appears to hold a slight advantage in the upcoming tennis match, given his aptitude for handling pressure and track record in challenging situations.
Ryan Nijboer vs Gonzalo Bueno Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
R. Nijboer vs G. Bueno H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
| 1 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 17 | Games Won | 18 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 10 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 3:8:9 | Average Match Time | 3:8:9 |
| 57% (73/127) | 1st Serve % | 71% (85/119) |
| 73% (53/73) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (50/85) |
| 37% (20/54) | 2nd Serve Win % | 59% (20/34) |
| 50% (5/10) | Break Pts Won % | 29% (5/17) |
| 41% (49/119) | Return Points Win % | 43% (54/127) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
R. Nijboer Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 6-2 6-4 | ||
QF | L | 2-6 6-2 6-1 | ||
R2 | W | 6-3 6-1 | ||
R1 | W | 6-4 6-2 | ||
R2 | L | 7-5 6-3 | ||
G. Bueno Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | L | 6-2 6-1 | ||
R1 | W | 6-2 6-4 | ||
R1 | L | 6-0 6-2 | ||
SF | L | 6-4 6-3 | ||
QF | W | 7-5 2-6 6-4 | ||

R. Nijboer vs G. Bueno Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56.63% (299/229) | YTD Win/Loss | 55.43% (143/115) |
| 56.21% (688/536) | Sets Win/Loss | 53.51% (320/278) |
| 52.81% (6003/5364) | Games Win/Loss | 50.94% (2833/2728) |
| 59.09% (104/72) | Hard Win/Loss | 40.00% (2/3) |
| 57.72% (187/137) | Clay Win/Loss | 55.95% (141/111) |
| 28.57% (8/20) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 0.22 | Aces Per Game | 0.08 |
| 1223 | Aces Total | 205 |
| 0.33 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.2 |
| 1848 | Total Double Faults | 532 |
| 1:34:40 | Average Match Time | 1:46:31 |
| 484.55 | Average Opponent Rank | 380.78 |
| 63% (20100/31891) | 1st Serve % | 66% (11370/17344) |
| 67% (13458/20100) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (7021/11370) |
| 46% (5400/11791) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (2884/5974) |
| 45% (1622/3567) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (947/2104) |
| 43% (13709/32249) | Return Points Win % | 44% (7662/17588) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 60.00% (3/2) |
| 20.00% (1/4) | Main Tour W/L | 50.00% (1/1) |
| 42.22% (38/52) | Challenger W/L | 50.00% (81/81) |
| 60.05% (260/173) | Futures W/L | 65.17% (58/31) |
| 57% (292/516) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 55% (142/256) |
| 33% (2/6) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 47% (66/139) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 51% (33/65) |
| 46% (77/168) | Deciding Set Win % | 58% (49/84) |
| 83% (315/262) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (142/122) |
| 17% (315/53) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (142/20) |
| 17% (213/37) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 18% (116/21) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

Mayar Sherif vs Varvara Lepchenko Prediction – WTA Argentina Open – 29th November 2025 Best Bets

Mayar Sherif vs Varvara Lepchenko Prediction – WTA Argentina Open – 29th November 2025 Best Bets

James Duckworth vs Dane Sweeny Prediction – ATP Playford Challenger – 29th November 2025 Best Bets

Mayar Sherif vs Caroline Dolehide Prediction – WTA Argentina Open – 28th November 2025 Best Bets

Mayar Sherif vs Caroline Dolehide Prediction – WTA Argentina Open – 28th November 2025 Best Bets
